Police locate suspect’s converted truck near Hambacher Forst; suspect remains at large
Police seized a converted truck belonging to Daniel V. near the Hambacher Forst on 4 September 2026. The suspect, who claimed responsibility for sabotage attacks on high‑voltage substations in Dormagen, Jänschwalde and Bergheim, was not arrested and is still being pursued.
Police seized a motorhome‑converted LKW that investigators link to 48‑year‑old medical graduate Daniel V. on the evening of 4 September 2026, but the suspect was not arrested and is still being hunted across North‑Rhine Westphalia.
Seizure of the suspect’s vehicle
According to a report by taz, a special police unit stormed the vehicle on Friday evening, describing it as “ein zum Wohnmobil umgebauten LKW, der dem Mann gehören soll”. The operation took place in Niederzier, “in unmittelbarer Nähe vom Hambacher Forst”. The forest adjacent to the Hambach lignite mine is a well‑known hotspot for climate‑activist actions, which adds a symbolic dimension to the location of the find.
The police statement confirmed that the truck was linked to Daniel V., a resident of Gevelsberg, but that “Festgenommen wurde der Mann aber nicht”. NRW‑Innenminister Herbert Reul, speaking later that evening, said the suspect was “vermutlich zu Fuß unterwegs und werde nicht weit kommen”. The minister’s comment underscores that the suspect managed to evade capture despite the rapid deployment of a specialised unit.
Who is Daniel V.?
Daniel V. is described in the same taz article as a 48‑year‑old medical graduate living in Gevelsberg. He is not a public figure, and the police have not disclosed any further personal details. What is known comes from a confession letter he sent to the newspaper, in which he identifies himself as the author of a series of sabotage attacks on high‑voltage substations.
The letter, reproduced in the report, states that the author built “selbstgebaute Abschussvorrichtungen” – homemade rocket‑launch devices – and used them to target substations in three locations: Dormagen, Jänschwalde and Bergheim. The confession is the only direct admission of responsibility that investigators have received, and it matches the pattern of the recent attacks.
Overview of the three sabotage incidents
The three attacks referenced in the confession have been documented in the same taz coverage. While exact dates are not provided, the incidents are described as recent and part of a coordinated campaign against Germany’s high‑voltage grid.
Key details of the three high‑voltage substation sabotage incidents referenced by the suspect
Location
Device type
Outcome
Dormagen
Self‑made rocket‑like devices discovered by a passer‑by
No damage recorded
Jänschwalde
Rocket devices that failed to launch
No power outage
Bergheim
Six rocket‑launch stations; several caused short‑circuits
Multiple lines down; five lignite‑power‑plant blocks taken offline
Source: taz
The Dormagen incident, described as a “Fußgänger … an einem Feldrand nahe einem Umspannwerk … entdeckt”, resulted in no damage. In Jänschwalde, the devices “waren erfolgreich, es kam aber zu keinen Stromausfällen”, indicating a failed launch. Bergheim saw the most severe impact: six stations were found, and a short‑circuit forced the shutdown of several transmission lines, pulling five coal‑fired power blocks from the grid.
Police response and ongoing manhunt
Following the seizure, the police announced a nationwide search for Daniel V. The minister’s remark that the suspect is “vermutlich zu Fuß unterwegs” suggests that investigators believe he fled on foot from the scene in Niederzier. No arrest was made at the time of the raid, and the police have not released any further details about the suspect’s whereabouts.
Authorities have emphasized that the discovery of the truck provides “the first concrete lead in the recent series of high‑voltage substation sabotage attacks”. The vehicle’s conversion from a standard LKW to a mobile living space is consistent with the suspect’s alleged modus operandi of moving equipment and launching devices from remote locations.
While the police have not disclosed the exact forensic evidence linking the truck to the attacks, the combination of the vehicle’s location, the suspect’s confession letter, and the timing of the raids creates a strong circumstantial case. The investigation remains open, and officials have warned that the suspect could still pose a threat if he attempts further sabotage.
Context: why the attacks matter
Germany’s high‑voltage transmission network is a critical component of the country’s energy transition, carrying electricity from renewable generation sites to industrial centres. Disruptions, even brief, can jeopardise supply stability and undermine public confidence in the energy system. The Bergheim incident, which forced five lignite‑power‑plant blocks offline, illustrates how a relatively small number of homemade devices can have outsized effects on the grid.
The Hambacher Forst, where the truck was found, has been a focal point for climate‑activist protests against lignite mining. The proximity of the seizure to this symbolic site raises questions about whether the suspect’s actions are politically motivated or purely criminal. The police have not linked the sabotage to any extremist ideology, and the suspect’s confession does not mention a political motive.
Nevertheless, the series of attacks has prompted a broader discussion among energy operators, security services, and policymakers about protecting critical infrastructure. The German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action has previously called for enhanced surveillance of high‑voltage sites, and the current case may accelerate those efforts.
Open questions and next steps
Several uncertainties remain. First, the exact number of devices that were prepared but not deployed is unknown; the packet notes “rund 20 weitere aufgestellte Raketen hoben nicht ab” in Jänschwalde, suggesting a larger cache that could be recovered. Second, the motive behind the attacks has not been established beyond the suspect’s own admission. Third, the police have not disclosed whether any additional suspects or accomplices are being investigated.
Finally, the impact on the public remains to be seen. While no fatalities have been reported, the temporary loss of power in Bergheim affected local industry and households. If the suspect were to evade capture and continue the campaign, the risk of more severe outages could increase.
For now, the focus remains on locating Daniel V. and securing the remaining high‑voltage infrastructure. The seizure of his converted truck marks a tangible breakthrough, but the manhunt is ongoing, and authorities have urged anyone with information to come forward.
As the investigation unfolds, the case will likely shape future policy on protecting Germany’s energy grid and may influence how law‑enforcement agencies coordinate cross‑regional operations against similar threats.


