Grindr agrees £26 million UK privacy settlement, ending two‑year legal fight
Grindr will pay £26 million to settle a UK class‑action over the alleged sharing of users’ HIV status with advertisers, with payments split into two £13 million instalments.

Grindr has agreed to a £26 million settlement with a UK class‑action that alleged the dating app shared highly sensitive personal data, including HIV status, with advertising firms. The payment will be made in two instalments of £13 million – the first by the end of 2026 and the second by March 2027 – and will be distributed among roughly 12,000 claimants, equating to an average of about £2,167 per person.
Legal background and claim details
The lawsuit was filed by the London law firm Austen Hays on behalf of 12,000 users in April 2024. The claim contended that Grindr breached UK privacy law by allowing ad companies access to private information, including HIV status, during a period that extended to early 2020. The Guardian reports that Grindr did not admit liability but acknowledged the distress caused to users.
According to the Guardian, the settlement ends a two‑year legal battle and represents the most significant privacy‑related payout for a dating app in the UK to date.
Settlement mechanics
The £26 million figure is split evenly, meaning each claimant would receive roughly £2,167 if the amount is divided equally. The first £13 million instalment is due by the end of 2026, with the second £13 million due by March 2027. The Guardian confirms these dates and amounts.
While the settlement does not require Grindr to admit wrongdoing, the company has stated that it “acknowledged user distress” and will implement “enhanced data‑privacy safeguards” moving forward, as noted in the same report.
Grindr’s financial context
Grindr’s latest publicly filed accounts, filed on 7 August 2026, show a revenue of $268.1 million for the six‑month period ending 30 June 2026, a net income of $44.5 million for the same period, and total assets of $462.8 million. These figures are presented in US dollars, the currency used in the company’s SEC filings.
Below is a summary of the key financial metrics from the most recent 10‑Q filing:
| Metric | Value | Currency | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 268,079,000 | USD | 1 Jan 2026 – 30 Jun 2026 |
| Net income | 44,493,000 | USD | 1 Jan 2026 – 30 Jun 2026 |
| Total assets | 462,838,000 | USD | 30 Jun 2026 |
All three figures are drawn from the Form 10‑Q filed on 7 August 2026. The settlement amount, expressed in pounds sterling, cannot be directly compared without an exchange rate, which the packet does not provide.
Historical privacy issues
The Guardian also notes that Grindr announced in April 2018 that it would stop sharing users’ HIV status with third‑party companies after a Norwegian research report highlighted such data sharing. In 2021, Norway’s data‑protection authority fined Grindr 65 million Norwegian krone (approximately £4.8 million), representing about 10 % of its global revenues at the time.
These earlier incidents provide context for the current settlement, illustrating a pattern of regulatory scrutiny over Grindr’s handling of sensitive health data.
Timeline of the case
- April 2024 – Austen Hays files the class‑action claim in the High Court of England and Wales.
- 7 September 2026 – Grindr announces the £26 million settlement.
- End of 2026 – First £13 million instalment due.
- March 2027 – Second £13 million instalment due.
Outstanding questions
The settlement does not disclose how many of the 12,000 claimants will actually receive the average £2,167, as some may have opted out or been ineligible. Grindr has not revealed whether any additional privacy‑policy changes will be mandated by the UK regulator beyond the company’s own commitments.
Furthermore, the company’s chief executive and exact headcount remain unconfirmed in the packet; the SEC filing provides no personnel numbers, and the research notes advise verification before publication.
What remains clear is that the £26 million payout marks the conclusion of a high‑profile privacy dispute and signals heightened scrutiny of data‑sharing practices across the tech sector.


